Molly F.
Sherlock
Specialist
in Public Finance
Margot L. Crandall-Hollick
Analyst in Public Finance
Energy tax
policy has been actively debated in the 112th Congress. Much of this debate has centered
around proposals in the President’s FY2012 and FY2013 budgets, proposals to
eliminate certain tax preferences, and proposals to extend other expired
or expiring provisions. The Obama Administration has proposed a number of
changes in energy tax policy with the intent of correcting perceived
distortions in the market and encouraging conservation and the use of renewable
energy. Specifically, the Administration seeks to eliminate a number of
existing tax incentives for fossil fuels. Further, the Administration has
proposed expanding select incentives for commercial-building energy
efficiency, extending incentives to promote manufacturing of advanced
energy technologies, extending certain renewable energy incentives, and
modifying incentives for alternative technology vehicles. In early 2012,
Congress considered the possible extension of certain temporary energy tax
provisions, which had either expired at the end of 2011 or were scheduled
to expire in coming years (see S.Amdt. 1812 to S. 1813 and S. 2204). S. 2204 would
pay for the extension of certain expired and expiring provisions by eliminating
certain tax incentives for oil and gas. Many of the provision that expired
at the end of 2011 were previously granted a temporary extension as part
of the Tax Relief, Unemployment Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act
(P.L. 111-312), enacted in December 2010.
Energy tax policy involves the use of one of the government’s main fiscal
instruments, taxes (both as an incentive and as a disincentive) to alter
the allocation or configuration of energy resources and their use. In
theory, energy taxes and subsidies, like tax policy instruments in general,
are intended either to correct a problem or distortion in the energy markets or
to achieve some economic (efficiency, equity, or even macroeconomic)
objective. In practice, however, energy tax policy in the United States is
made in a political setting, determined by fiscal dictates and the views
and interests of the key players in this setting, including policymakers,
special interest groups, and academic scholars. As a result, enacted tax
policy embodies compromises between economic and political goals, which
could either mitigate or compound existing distortions.
The economic rationale for government intervention in energy markets is
commonly based on the government’s perceived ability to correct for market
failures. Market failures, such as externalities, principal-agent problems,
and informational asymmetries, result in an economically inefficient
allocation of resources—in which society does not maximize well-being. To
correct for these market failures governments can utilize several policy
options, including taxes, subsidies, and regulation, in an effort to
achieve policy goals.
Current energy policy reflects efforts to achieve both current and past policy
objectives. Recent legislative efforts have primarily focused on renewable
energy production and conservation to address environmental concerns. In
contrast, past efforts attempted to reduce reliance on foreign energy
sources through increased domestic production of fossil fuels. Legislation
enacted in the 111th Congress focusing on encouraging renewable energy
production and conservation reduces reliance on imported, foreign oil,
while also addressing environmental concerns by reducing the use of fossil
fuels. Favorable tax preferences given to domestic fossil fuel energy sources
also promote domestic energy production, reducing the demand for imported
oil.
Date of Report: March 28, 2012
Number of Pages: 31
Order Number: R41769
Price: $29.95
Follow us on TWITTER at http://www.twitter.com/alertsPHP
or #CRSreports
Document available via e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To order, e-mail Penny
Hill Press or call us at 301-253-0881. Provide a Visa, MasterCard, American
Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card.
Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred
and receive priority processing.